Honda X-4Riding Sun

Motorcycles and other stuff from a New Yorker living in Tokyo
In this post (and again in this post), I looked at the declining level of monthly US troop deaths in Iraq, and noted that "a cynic might say that US troop deaths are down because Iraqis are attacking each other."

Well, it turns out that cynic would be wrong. Via Instapundit, MyElectionAnalysis looks at additional data (pdf) from the Brookings Institution and says:
But it must be that the insurgency is turning their assault on Iraqi military and police, who are increasingly taking up the slack, right?

215, 176, 193, 189, 158, 193 (and the three months before that were 304, 282, 233)

Okay, okay, so insurgents aren’t engaging us; they’re turning increasingly to car bombs then, right?

70, 70, 70, 68, 30, 30

Civilians then. They’re just garroting poor civilians.

527, 826, 532, 732, 950, 446 (upper bound, two months before that were 2489 and 1129).
Of course, we would like those numbers to be much, much lower. But it's clearly wrong to say that they're spiraling out of control.

FOLLOW-UP:
Demonstrating the uncanny political instincts and keen sense of timing that served him so well in his failed Presidential campaign, John F. Kerry recently claimed that U.S. troops are "in the middle of an escalating civil war." If current trends continue, brace yourself for the flip-flop.

ANOTHER FOLLOW-UP:
Page four of the Brookings report (pdf) has a graph of US troop deaths that's very similar to the one I posted here.
Posted by GaijinBiker on 04.06.2006 at 12:40pm
Topics: Iraq, Military, Politics, USA
Big Ben (mail) (www):
If the numbers are correct, this is heartening. But it's important to remember that the number of fatalities, especially among US troops, is determined more by what specific military actions we have chosen to take in that time period than by the general situation. (Though obviously this doesn't apply to the number of car bombs.) I'm afraid the numbers don't really tell us much by themselves. The political situation is as unstable as ever, and could spiral out of control at any time.

It's also important to remember that there have been several periods of waning violence by Palestinians in Israel and the occupied territories, and the violence always starts back up again. This is despite the Israelis' determination and perseverance and resolve, and unaffected by the all-powerful liberal bias of the NYT. The Israelis have been "pressing on" for decade after decade, and Palestinian militants still don't show any signs of giving up. Why do you think Iraqi insurgents will be any less devoted to their cause?
4.6.2006 1:11pm
GaijinBiker (mail) (www):
I don't think the Israeli comparison is meaningful. We are working together with elements of the Iraqi people and leaders against the militants and extremists in their midst. The Israelis lack any kind of similar cooperative element among the Palestinians.
4.6.2006 1:27pm
langtry (mail):
Can we now admit, being slightly OT, that John Kerry was perhaps the worst possible candidate the Dems could have selected for President? And that he was there solely because the Dems felt no one else could slay the dread Howard Dean? Is anyone else as concerned about the fact that these two are still at the helm of the Party?

They are a number of Republicans whom, if they were slated for President, would send me into serious consideration of the Democrat candidate. It would be a relief if they would get serious and offer a better alternative than they have during the last couple of elections. And no, Hillary Clinton would not restore my faith in the Party's clear-headedness. We share nothing more than similar reproductive systems, something the Dems don't seem to understand either.
4.6.2006 11:46pm
Major Bristols (mail):
As someone who's cynical about cynicism, I can think of few things more cynical than suggesting that somehow, the U.S. position in the war in Iraq is getting better.
4.7.2006 6:56am
Big Ben (mail) (www):
langtry,
Though he would have made a better president than Dubya by several orders of magnitude, I'll agree that he was a terrible candidate, and I thought so from early in the primaries.


We share nothing more than similar reproductive systems, something the Dems don't seem to understand either.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. What gives you the idea that democrats think all women are the same? Have people been mistaking you for Hillary?

I hope she doesn't get the nomination, but I'd vote for her in a heartbeat over Jeb or McCain.
4.7.2006 1:17pm
langtry (mail):
Big Ben:
"I'm not sure what you mean by this. What gives you the idea that democrats think all women are the same? Have people been mistaking you for Hillary?"
What I mean by that is that Democrats, in particular, have long believed that I, as a woman, am desperately awaiting a woman President and will vote for Hillary. Values, approaches to solving national problems, how the economy should be managed, etc. are of no concern: I will vote for a woman candidate because, like Eve Ensler, I believe people's morality is determined by whether they possess a v*gina or a p*nis (I use the asterisks so that GB doesn't end up a result in some bizarre google search). I know enough women who think this way to make it a very real concern. We could go on and on about why I think Hillary is as awful a candidate as Jeb or McCain (neither of whom I would vote for, for a variety of reasons), but it's secondary to my point: the Democrats have to start offering better candidates than they have in the very recent past. My concern is that they seem indebted to those ideas that have ill-served them in the past, and their troubles will likely continue if they fail to recognize their political dissonance.
4.7.2006 11:40pm
Major Bristols (mail):
There are definitely too many Democrats who think women can't wait to vote for a woman for president. But for every one of them, there's a Republican who could never vote for a woman based on cro-magnon ideas about the innate superiority of men.

Fortunately, neither of those ideas steers either party.
4.8.2006 5:01am
Account:
Password:
Remember info?
COMMENTS POLICY:
A user account is required to post comments. If you do not have an account, please feel free to create one. Accounts with obscene or offensive user names will be rejected.

I always have time for a well-articulated opposing viewpoint, thoughtfully and politely expressed in good faith.

However, I have no time for name calling, personal attacks, rudeness, or other types of hostile behavior, whether directed at me or at other commenters.

Therefore, comments I find to be rude, abusive, profane, annoying, or otherwise inappropriate may be deleted. Comments may also be deleted if they are redundant or off-topic.

The maximum comment length is 3,000 characters. Longer comments broken into multiple parts to circumvent this policy will be deleted. If your comment is too long, please edit it down, link to the full text on your own blog, or both.

Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.ridingsun.com/admin/trackbackdrum.pl?post=1144291199

Listed below are links to blogs or other websites which have notified this blog that they've posted something which links to Iraqi civilian, military deaths also down. This is an automatically generated list and the presence of any link on this list should not be construed as an endorsement of them.

The US and its war propaganda

Excerpt:

The U.S. military is conducting a propaganda campaign to magnify the role of the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, according to internal military documents and officers familiar with the program, says the <...

Blog: Yankumi: news about Japan, Holland, games and translations

Tracked Back: Mon Apr 10 15:44:25 2006